Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
Phone Number: (573) 751-4091
On March 4, 2010, Gov. Jay Nixon signed legislation that makes two important extensions to unemployment benefits in Missouri. Gov. Nixon's signature means House Bill 1544 will immediately provide extra tools to Missourians looking for work and businesses struggling to keep workers employed.
Under this law, unemployed Missourians who have exhausted all state regular and federal Emergency Unemployment Compensation benefits may file for benefits for up to 20 weeks under the state Extended Benefits program. This extension, which is 100 percent federally funded, will last until the funds run out or March 3, 2011, whichever comes first. The Missouri Labor Department estimates up to 4,000 eligible Missourians will be assisted by these extended unemployment benefits. This bill also adds 26 weeks to the Shared Work Program, for a total of 52 weeks per plan year. This program allows Missouri businesses that would otherwise lay off employees to reduce those employees' hours, but cover part of those lost wages with unemployment benefits. Missouri is one of 17 states to offer the Shared Work Program. On the last working day in February, there were 565 employers throughout the state participating in the program, affecting more than 43,139 employees for the same period of time. "As this economy begins to recover, we must give unemployed Missourians the tools to get back to work, while giving businesses the resources to keep Missourians employed," Gov. Nixon said. "This bipartisan legislation will help put Missourians back to work and save thousands of good-paying Missouri jobs. I appreciate the Legislature's prompt action on this important issue."
421 East Dunklin St.
P.O. Box 504
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Good afternoon.
It’s a pleasure to be here today. I’d like to thank all of you in the Springfield Chamber for your strong leadership in this community.
I just arrived from Poplar Bluff, where I had the honor of meeting with 73 soldiers from the 205th Military Police Battalion, who are being deployed to Afghanistan.
Looking into the faces of those brave patriots, who are putting their lives on the line to fight terrorism more than seven thousand miles from home… leaving their spouses and children behind for months at a stretch...it puts our troubles on the home front in perspective mighty quick.
To all the men and women of our armed forces, thank you for your commitment, and God bless you in your service.
There’s a major challenge staring us in the face in state government. Three months after we prepared next year’s budget, our economic models are becoming clearer.
While our state economy is starting to tick upward, state revenue is not. And it probably won’t for some time. That means we’ve got a $500 million hole in next year’s budget.
Some have suggested that the most expedient way to plug that hole and balance the budget is to make across-the-board cuts of 10 percent.
Across-the-board cuts are a simplistic solution − not a thoughtful, responsible course of action. And they’re simply not the right way forward. Because there are vital services government always has to provide. No matter what, we still have to have teachers in our classrooms… state troopers on our highways… and corrections officers keeping violent offenders off the street.
To get the savings we need, we must right-size state government by cutting programs, trimming the workforce, and consolidating departments while maintaining excellence in our services.
Every state is grappling with this downturn, and twenty-nine states have raised taxes. But one thing is off the table here in the Show-Me State. We will hold the line on taxes.
Today, I am going to outline my blueprint for getting the budget savings we need, downsizing where we have to, and delivering vital services to the people of Missouri.
That’s a lot of heavy lifting, and I’m going to need the help of the legislature to get this done. We have worked together from day one, and we’ve weathered some of the roughest waters our state has ever seen.
We can − and we will − do it again. And when we get this right, we’ll come out the other side with a government that is leaner, nimbler and more efficient.
That will put us in a stronger position to lead the nation, and accelerate out of this downturn.
Tackling tough challenges is nothing new. From the moment I took office, I have focused on turning this economy around; creating jobs; and building a foundation for future growth.
In the 14 months I’ve been Governor, I’ve had to make cuts totaling more than $1.2 billion to balance the state budget, including $125 million in cuts I authorized this morning.
We’ve also taken some common sense steps, like conserving energy, and have saved more than three million dollars on our utility bills.
I also had to reduce the size of state government by 1,800 positions. That wasn’t a decision I made lightly. But our early action and fiscal discipline helped us avoid the meltdowns we’ve seen in other states, and earned us national respect. Moody’s continues to rate Missouri one of the top states to lead the nation in economic recovery.
And we are the only state in the Midwest with a spotless, Triple A rating from all three ratings firms: Moody’s, Standard and Poors, and Fitch.
Even in these challenging times, Missouri’s unemployment rate – while still too high – also remains lower than the national average.
While taking steps to get the government’s house in order, we’ve also focused on improving Missouri’s business climate.
Over the past 14 months, I’ve sat down with business owners from one end of the state to the other, including a very valuable roundtable discussion with several of you.
Last year, we came up with new economic tools to help businesses large and small. And we’ve got a new comprehensive jobs package for 2010 that will drive more growth in the future.
One of the things I’m most proud of is that we worked together to freeze tuition at state colleges and universities, because education is key to our economic prosperity. For Missouri to thrive in the long-term, we have got to right-size government, zero in on our priorities and focus on the future.
That’s what this blueprint is all about.
Let’s start with right-sizing. As I’ve said, our challenge is to cut $500 million out of next year’s budget. When you’re confronted with a number that large, across-the-board cuts may seem appealing. But that’s simplistic and short-sighted. It wouldn’t solve the problem, and it would hurt the people of Missouri.
Just think about it. We need the Highway Patrol to get drunk drivers off the road. We need night guards walking the halls of our prisons. And we need inspectors to protect our elderly loved ones in nursing homes. Birth certificates, driver’s licenses, tax refunds.
I could go on. There are numerous examples of essential services we depend on state government to provide. But by taking a careful look across departments and programs, we can lean up government without sacrificing those vital services.
And that’s exactly what we’re going to do. We’re going to find wasted office space and sell unnecessary buildings. We’re going to sell 2,000 cars out of the state fleet. We’re going to eliminate three extra state holidays, including Truman’s birthday. Every holiday costs us about $1.2 million; we’re talking about real savings in tough times.
As one fiscally conservative Democrat to another, Harry, I hope you understand.
And we are going to have to downsize the state workforce again, and eliminate another 1,000 positions. Again, this will be a difficult process, and we’ll be there every step of the way to help provide training and support as these folks transition to new careers.
But this still won’t be enough to get us to $500 million. We need to find more savings by consolidating functions.
Wherever we can reduce the bureaucracy and streamline services for the taxpayers, we must do it – and we will.
Let me give you a few examples.
Missouri has a Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, and a Department of Higher Education. We need to have one Department of Education that prepares students from the day they walk into pre-school to the day they walk across the stage with their college diplomas.
State law enforcement can be made more efficient as well. Missouri has one full-time agency that enforces state laws on our highways 365 days a year, and an entirely separate agency that enforces state laws on our waterways.
We need to consolidate the Highway Patrol and the Water Patrol, so that our dedicated law enforcement agents can provide the citizens of Missouri with seamless protection, whether they’re traveling our highways or floating our lakes and streams.
We can achieve these administrative efficiencies while maintaining the full force on our roads and our waterways. The same consolidation efforts should apply to other services, including environmental permits. Right now, businesses have to deal with numerous separate bureaucracies within the DNR to get the required permits.
That’s time-consuming, redundant and, frankly, maddening. We need a one-stop shop that streamlines the permitting process, while ensuring that Missouri has clean water and clean air.
There are many other ways we can make government leaner. We can consolidate state labs. We can put more government services online. We can fold up the sprawling bureaucracy of the Family Support Division, which has offices in every one of Missouri’s 114 counties, and create regional offices.
We can privatize the collection of child support, and make that system work better for families.
We can follow the lead of the private sector, and modernize pension and health care programs for state employees. These sorts of structural changes will move the needle.
But they’re not enough. We need to more clearly define the scope of what we can do – and can’t do – for our citizens. We’ve taken a hard look at state programs that aren’t delivering a return on investment.
It’s time to retool them, or get rid of them.
Take tax credits, for example. Over the last 10 years, our use of tax credits has ballooned to $585 million a year; that’s 86 percent growth.
Tax credits of all types were passed with good intentions, and were intended to create jobs and spark economic development. In many cases, tax credits are producing a positive return on our investments.
But there are some that aren’t.
When it comes to economic development, we have a responsibility to look at the ROI, and determine which tax credits are delivering for Missouri taxpayers. The answer right now is obvious. The state is overpaying, and tax credits are underperforming.
That must change.
We need to reshape state tax credits to improve our ROI. We need to use tax credits strategically and make sure they are moving our economy forward.
That means putting caps on some tax credits, and giving the Department of Economic Development more discretion over which projects we will be investing in. However, we will NOT touch the circuit-breaker tax credits that help seniors and disabled folks stay in their homes.
They’ll still be protected, as they should be. We also need to make changes in another well-intentioned area: financial aid for higher education.
Currently, many of our state college scholarship programs – both for merit and for need – provide financial support to students whether they choose to attend public or private colleges.
In some cases, students at private schools actually get larger scholarships than students at public institutions. Missouri has wonderful colleges and universities, both public and private.
But in times like these, we simply can’t continue to subsidize the choice to attend a private school.Refocusing also means making difficult choices about where to invest our limited resources.
For instance, our investment in biofuels. We will continue to fund biodiesel for the rest of this year, but the current subsidy levels are not sustainable. I will work with the legislature to develop a plan for this industry that fits with our energy goals and stays within our means.
My blueprint for change will recalibrate the size and scope of state government, giving us government that is leaner, nimbler, and less costly. Government that is focused on the right priorities:
· Educating our children in first-rate public schools, from pre-school through graduate school;
· Protecting our families and communities, responding to emergencies, and locking up violent criminals; and
· Making sure our most vulnerable citizens – children, the elderly, the disabled – get the services they need.
Folks, we have a real opportunity to transform our government, and to streamline its operations.
Yes, that means we are going to do fewer things. But we are going to do them more efficiently, and more effectively, and with greater accountability to the taxpayers.
That’s what my blueprint for change is all about. It contains some new ideas that have been well thought out.
This blueprint is the right plan, at the right time, to move Missouri forward. I’m an optimist. Always have been, always will be.
Times may be tough, but Missourians are tougher. And when we work together, we can accomplish anything.
Every idea I have mentioned today is a product of my firm belief that Missouri’s brightest days still lie ahead. As Governor, I can accomplish some of these reforms on my own.
But it will take teamwork and cooperation to accomplish everything that’s called for in my blueprint.
I need the support and energy of every person in this room, and every person in this state, to move it forward. I am confident that when the legislature comes back next week, we can get this done.
And when we do, Missouri will be more innovative … more competitive … and more prosperous … for generations to come.
Thank you.
The Los Angeles Times scoops Missouri Democrats distance from Obama...
"And for Truman's sake, don't even mention the name of your party's likely U.S. Senate candidate, Robin Carnahan, to face the GOP's Rep. Roy Blunt for the retiring Republican Kit Bond's Missouri seat.
Why not mention her? Well, the Missouri secretary of State just happened to be out of town on the very day that her own party's president shows up. Wouldn't you know? Unavoidable schedule conflict, everybody says. (Truth is, she had her own fund-rai$er at Sen. Mary Landrieu's house back in that evil Washington place.)
Also, Carnahan's absence may be associated with the fact that nearly six out of 10 Missourians currently disapprove of Obama's job as president. And a photo of Obama raising her arm in the air could come back to haunt come Halloween.
Additional absentees were Democratic Reps. Russ Carnahan (Robin's brother) and Ike Skelton, one of 39 Democrats to vote "Nay" on the first Obama healthcare bill."
As the health care debate in Washington once again reaches fevered pitch, it looks increasingly likely that Congressional leaders will ram their bill through, despite the opposition of the American people. The potential implications for Missouri mean we must get serious about taking the necessary action to protect Missourians and ensure the federal government cannot overstep its bounds.
The Founding Fathers had the foresight and understanding of mankind’s inherent desire for freedom to pen a Constitution that, if upheld, would protect an individual’s right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, the final in the Bill of Rights, reserved to the states all powers not specifically delegated to the federal government. The rationale behind this important protection is that most of the decisions of government should be made closest to the voters affected by them, where the voters can better monitor the workings of their government and speak out. Now, almost 220 years later, this governing principle is in genuine peril.
While the federal government was designed to perform a few specific functions, the Founding Fathers appropriately limited its scope of power. Unfortunately, in the time since the adoption of the Bill of Rights, the federal government has slowly and methodically pushed beyond the bounds of the 10th Amendment and taken on areas of appropriation, legislation and regulation that should be handled closer to the voters. In 1791, Thomas Jefferson wrote that he considered the 10th Amendment the basis of our nation’s founding document, and warned of the consequences of violating this principle, saying, “To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition.”
The federal health care proposal on the verge of being rammed through Congress via a procedure called “reconciliation” (a process traditionally reserved for matters relating to the budget and deficit) is such a step toward that boundless field of power. This federal monstrosity would impose hundreds of millions of dollars in additional spending on Missouri’s already strapped budget, while also forcing Missourians to enter private contracts with other private parties or face tax penalties backed up by the threat of imprisonment. Even without the budget busting costs of this bill (in the face of outlandish claims that it will actually reduce the deficit), its invasion into the private lives of citizens is utterly unamerican. It all boils down to more federal government control, less personal freedom and spending mandates that most states will not be able to afford, particularly in light of their own budget troubles.
Perhaps in the end we will find that this health care fiasco has done us a favor. People are waking up to the realization that the federal government is overstepping its bounds and something must be done to stop it. That is why I have sponsored Senate Joint Resolution 34, which will give the Governor, the General Assembly and the people (acting by initiative petition) the authority to compel the Missouri Attorney General to file suit challenging federal laws that violate the 10th Amendment. Additionally, I co-sponsored Senate Joint Resolution 25, along with several of my colleagues, which, if approved by Missouri voters, would change our state’s constitution to prohibit any laws mandating that private citizens enter into private contracts for health care or participate in government run health programs. This legislation was recently passed out of committee and is now ready to be taken up for debate on the Senate floor. We must preserve our ability to make decisions when it comes to the health care of Missouri residents.
In the not-so-distant past, our federal government operated under the assumption that the less it intruded into the lives of Americans, the better off we all would be. In fact, our entire democracy was founded on the principles of limited government, respecting the rights of the individual and promoting self-responsibility. We must return to our nation’s roots of self-sufficiency and personal freedom, and we must begin by limiting the federal government to its Constitutionally defined powers.
Summary of SC90324, City of Springfield, Missouri v. Adolph Belt Jr.
Appeal from the Greene County circuit court, Judge Mark Fitzsimmons
Argued and submitted Jan. 27, 2010; opinion issued March 2, 2010
Attorneys: Belt was represented by Jason T. Umbarger, an attorney in the solo practice of law in Springfield, (417) 865-4600, and the city was represented by Assistant City Attorney Johnnie J. Burgess of Springfield, (417) 864-1899.
This summary is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the communications counsel for the convenience of the reader. It neither has been reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court and should not be quoted or cited.
Overview: A man challenges both a red-light camera violation and the process by which a fine was imposed on him. In a unanimous decision written by Judge Michael A. Wolff, the Supreme Court of Missouri vacates the administrative decision, as the proceeding below is void. State statutes prohibit the city from establishing an administrative proceeding for moving violations such as the one here. Instead, such cases must be heard by a local associate circuit judge or municipal judge or at a county municipal court, if one exists in the county where the city is located.
Facts: In July 2008, the city of Springfield notified Adolph Belt Jr. that, in April 2008, a motor vehicle registered in his name had been photographed running a red light by a traffic camera. In the citation issued to Belt, the city alleged the images of his car were evidence of a violation of the city code and informed Belt he either could pay a $100 fine or, if he wished to contest the citation, “to request a court date.” If he appeared “in court,” the citation informed Belt the minimum he could be charged was a $100 penalty. Following Belt’s request for a court date, he received a notice informing him he would have a “contested hearing” at the “Springfield Municipal Court” in August 2008 and that the law governing the hearing would include chapter 536, RSMo. The notice informed him that, if he failed to appear and contest the case, the city’s municipal prosecutor’s office would represent the city and the “Hearing Officer” likely would enter a judgment against him. The person presiding over Belt’s hearing, continued at his request to September 2008, was Springfield’s municipal judge, who signed the findings of fact and conclusions of law in Belt’s case as “Hearing Examiner.” The hearing examiner found the city had shown that the vehicle was operated in violation of the red-light ordinance, that Belt owned the vehicle, and that the evidence did not support Belt’s assertion that the yellow light lasted for fewer than 4.5 seconds. The hearing examiner imposed a $100 penalty against Belt. Belt then appealed the hearing examiner’s determination, asking the circuit court for a trial de novo (where the court considers the evidence anew). The circuit court dismissed the case, finding it lacked jurisdiction to hear a request for a trial de novo. Belt appeals.
ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION VACATED.
Court en banc holds: The hearing examiner had no authority to penalize Belt for his vehicle’s violation of the red-light ordinance, and the administrative proceeding that occurred in this case is void. Springfield’s administrative system for prosecuting violations of its red-light ordinance violates section 479.010, RSMo Supp. 2009, which provides that violations of municipal
ordinances shall be heard and determined only before divisions of the circuit court. Section 479.040, RSMo Supp. 2009, outlines the choices from which a city such as Springfield may choose to have violations heard and determined: by an associate circuit judge of the circuit in which the city is located; by a municipal judge; or at a county municipal court if one is created in the county where the city is located. No provision is made for a city such as Springfield to have an administrative tribunal hear and determine moving violations such as Springfield’s red-light ordinance. The only administrative procedure the legislature has authorized for violations of municipal ordinances is for parking and other nonmoving violations in the cities of Kansas City and St. Louis. In addition, that the hearing examiner here also is a municipal judge would appear to violate section 479.020.6, RSMo Supp. 2009, which prohibits municipal judges from holding any other office in the municipality in which the person serves as a municipal judge. The decision penalizing Belt $100 for violating the city’s red-light ordinance is vacated.